So, with my company we just released our first two Soundbox packs and I’ve spent a lot of time with it. Coming from developing for Kontakt, of course I know this is a different product and I don’t expect the level of depth Kontakt offers (different markets, different audiences, different scope) but since I think this is such a great product with a lot of potential, I really feel some things could be improved.
This is my list of stuff that I REALLY miss:
-
Improved modulation workflow.
The modulations are a little messy: you can’t define the starting point of the modulated parameter (the modulation always starts from the middle value), modwheel doesn’t have minimum value offset… this is all very basic stuff that most competitors have. -
There are no unipolar modulators.
Can we have at the very least a couple of envelopes? -
The scaling of the controls is very odd: try changing the amp envelope of a layer and you’ll see that half-way through the envelope value is about 20% rather than 50%
-
What’s up with tempo sync values (delay time, sync modulators) not running unless the DAW is running and not showing up at all in standalone?
-
To my ears, and I might be wrong of course, the Vector crossfading is linear, which creates a dip in the middle. Equal power is typically the standard in these cases.
-
The effects could be a little (a lot) more high quality. The reverbs are really the only ok ones (cpu-hungry though!), the rest sounds like off the shelf DSP and some in my opinion are borderline not usable (Compressor).
-
Polyaftertouch please. You can’t support MPE natively and not have PolyAT! My Osmose is crying.
For the developers among us: please add something to help with mapping. I don’t want a full-blown pitch reading algo or an API… but at the very least a system that reads tokens from the file name.
I have more stuff, I just released this video with some considerations:
I hope this is taken the right way, as I said I LOVE this product, which is the reason why I’m doing this, I want it to do well