# Tied sequencer steps + ramps

**URL:** <https://forum.audiomodern.com/t/tied-sequencer-steps-ramps/1932>\
**Category:** Freezr\
**Created:** [July 28, 2024, 6:20pm UTC](https://forum.audiomodern.com/t/tied-sequencer-steps-ramps/1932 "2024-07-28T18:20:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spawklz](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.audiomodern.com/spawklz/32/769_2.png) [@spawklz](https://forum.audiomodern.com/u/spawklz)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2024, 6:20pm UTC](https://forum.audiomodern.com/t/tied-sequencer-steps-ramps/1932/1 "2024-07-28T18:20:58Z")

</div>

Hi  
I really like Freezr, but I feel like it’s missing a huge feature: the ability to “tie” sequencer steps - i.e. if two steps could be tied together, the last one would further manipulate the buffer from the last one. I can’t seem to find a way of doing this without using two instances.

Another cool thing would be if each step could have an optional ramp, so as to have a very quick rate change within a single step.

Cheers

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Audiomodern](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.audiomodern.com/audiomodern/32/3_2.png) [@Audiomodern](https://forum.audiomodern.com/u/Audiomodern)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 7:54am UTC](https://forum.audiomodern.com/t/tied-sequencer-steps-ramps/1932/2 "2024-08-08T07:54:04Z")

</div>

Hi spawklz,

Thanks for reaching out. These are both nice additions, we will check if we can add these to one of our upcoming updates.